GlazeCorp

heeshilio Verified account @heeshilio · 21h

How @glaze_corp funds are different from other onchain funds:

Speculation builds the fund

Most onchain funds mint new tokens at NAV, so their price is pinned to the backing and there’s nothing to speculate on. Ours are only created by mining, so the coin can trade above its backing. Miners pay based on that price, so the hotter the coin, the more money goes in to buy assets.

They grow from mining, not just trading fees

Funds that build from trading fees only grow when people trade. Ours grow every time a coin is mined, plus trading fees if they want them.

Holders or managers choose what it buys

In a community-led fund, holders allocate. A manager-led fund is run by people or agents.

They can evolve

Balancer style funds are set in stone at launch. Ours can add new assets and stop buying old ones.

They never sell

Balancer style funds rebalance, selling winners to buy losers. Ours only decide where new money goes, so winners keep running.

They’re built for up to 1,000 assets

Balancer style funds cap at 8. An S&P 500 fund holds 500.

They can hold almost anything

No price feed is needed, so a fund can hold tokenized stocks, yield tokens, leveraged tokens, low liquidity memecoins, and even its own liquidity.

There are no management fees

Imagine if BlackRock owned the exchange its ETFs trade on and earned trading fees instead of management fees. Every fund has its own market, so managers can earn from its swap fees or send them to the fund.

View quoted post on X

Roro Verified account @rorohuge · 2d

Fund creators on @glaze_corp earned $6.3K in week one

$3.3K from Mine fees

$3.0K from swap fees

Launch a fund, go to sleep, wake up to fees

Creator economy finally got a treasury 🍩

View quoted post on X

WALL STREET MINING CO Verified account @WSMCO_ · 3d

Me after one good seat at the mine

View quoted post on X