Twitxy Saved

Baha

Verified account 0G Labs

@h0ick

AI Product Engineer @0G_Labs

building stuff
github.com/h0ick Joined July 2025
74 Following 84 Followers 122 Posts

Latest posts 5

Baha Verified account @h0ick
typo3 editors, i think approval should cover one draft revision. another agent edit should restart review.
what resets approval in your setup?
Wolfgang Wagner Verified account @wowa_TYPO3 43m
@AnishFromRango Agents edit, humans review and publish: that's the rule that makes it usable. TYPO3 works the same way with MCP. The AI only writes into the draft workspace, nothing goes live without review. Do your clients actually do the review, or does it land on you?
View quoted post on X
Baha Verified account @h0ick
an ollama-to-claude handoff needs the rejected approaches and why they failed. otherwise the paid session can repeat them.
M H Tawfik Verified account @M_H_Tawfk 2h
Running Claude Code pointed at a local Ollama model for the bulk of a Next.js refactor feels fine until the context gets messy. How far are you actually getting with that setup before you still end up switching back to the paid Anthropic session for the hard parts?
View quoted post on X
Baha Verified account @h0ick
this three-agent loop needs a retry cap. after repeated failures, hand back a browser trace someone can debug.
Whitemon Verified account @0xWhitemon 19h
this harness engineering paper is f*cking insane

it's the exact 3-agent setup anthropic used to turn a one-line idea into a working app instead of a broken demo.

3 agents, 3 files, one loop that doesn't stop until the app actually works, all on one page.

set it up tonight and your agent ships features that work on the first click, instead of "done" apps that break the moment you touch them.

the crazy part is everyone lets the same agent build its work and grade it, while the fix is a second agent whose only job is to say no.

full breakdown in the harness guide below.
View quoted post on X