Twitxy Saved

heat

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@heat

Spain/UAE Joined March 2007
176 Following 3.8K Followers 1.2K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

heat Verified account @heat
robinhood:0x3ba500f1ababbcf0f0247d06d1c56fd7e6c4c09d 🪱

been digging thru agent wormhole docs and talking w the team for a while now. ngl, one of the few agent plays where the product actually makes sense to me.

everyone is bullish on AI agents trading, moving funds and interacting with protocols on their own. cool, but who's making sure they don't get tricked into signing something they shouldn't?

agents read websites, messages and even onchain transaction history. hide a malicious instruction in any of that and an agent might treat it as a real command. a payment bot reportedly sent ~3B DRB to an attacker after trusting another AI reply. crazy shit right.

the wallet can tell you whether a transaction will go through. it can't tell you whether it's what you actually wanted.

that's where Wormhole comes in.

before an agent makes a payment, it checks the recipient, amount, token and chain against the original quote. anything off? no signature. it also looks for hidden instructions in what agents read, protects their own rules from being rewritten, checks whether they got what they paid for and helps stop duplicate payments.

the hosted version adds spending limits and a kill switch too. sounds boring until agents start handling real money lmfao.

and the team is shipping. 5 integrations this past week with @RaetoCC, @gloamtrade, @routedotfun, @Griftwrld and @Borromarkets.

they're reporting 1M+ scans this week, while Wormbook, their RH chain social network and agent launchpad, has done over $500K volume with a second token burn completed.

now the part i like most: robinhood:0x3ba500f1ababbcf0f0247d06d1c56fd7e6c4c09d actually has a reason to exist beyond the narrative.

the local security tools are free, but the hosted API charges $0.003 per check. according to their docs, 100% of that revenue goes to robinhood:0x3ba500f1ababbcf0f0247d06d1c56fd7e6c4c09d buybacks and burns.

Wormbook also charges 1% per trade. 0.70% goes to creators, 0.30% to Wormbook, and 80% of Wormbook's cut goes to buybacks and burns.

4.36% of supply reportedly burned already, verifiable onchain.

more paid checks and more trading volume should mean more burns. obviously 1M scans doesn't mean 1M paid checks, so actual revenue growth is what i'm watching.

timing is interesting as fuck too. robinhood is pushing agentic trading and talking about built-in guardrails. if agents eventually handle money for millions of users, somebody needs to secure those actions.

Wormhole is positioning itself for exactly that, natively on RH chain.

at ~$3.2M MC after a 61% daily move, it's not the bottom anymore. young chain, RPC issues, early category and adoption isn't guaranteed. but for a working security product with integrations, usage and a clear burn mechanism, the r/r still looks pretty damn good to me.

comfy mid/long-term hold as long as they keep shipping.

higher. man just fucking higher.

robinhood:0x3ba500f1ababbcf0f0247d06d1c56fd7e6c4c09d 🪱
19 replies 18 reposts 102 likes 7K views View on X
heat Verified account @heat
guys stop looking at the fucking PA for a second and start looking at the actual utility behind the project.

and just in case you forgot what NullMask is actually building, here’s a quick reminder and why i’m still so fucking bullish on solana:HuAXPyDWDaMYFKuwQHpqL1oPnj93zdzWmtvFGzCeCUa7.

NullMask is basically building a privacy layer for the entire onchain ecosystem. zk-SNARKs, multichain, EVM + Solana, built-in AML/compliance and a product that keeps improving every single week.

now look at the numbers because this is where it gets hilarious af.

NullMask vs Tornado Cash (DefiLlama):

24h fees: $30K vs $5K (6x)
7d fees: $212K vs $68K (3x)
30d fees: $1M vs $500K (2x)

literally outperforming the biggest name in onchain privacy across every timeframe.

and we’re sitting at fucking $15M FDV. LMAO.

now compare it with Railgun. $130M-$150M mcap while $MASK trades at $15M FDV. almost a 10x valuation gap despite NullMask generating more fees.

Railgun is EVM-focused while NullMask already supports multiple EVM chains + Solana.

Tornado Cash? UX is a nightmare compared to NullMask. complicated setups, RPC/IPFS headaches and potentially long withdrawal delays depending on how you use it.

NullMask makes the whole process way easier, with shielding/unshielding workflows taking around 15-30min.

and the best part? they’re not even close to being done.

SDK, local RPC, wallet integrations, privacy perps, more chains, partnerships and potential CEX listings.

the vision is MUCH bigger than just another privacy protocol. they wanna become the privacy infrastructure for wallets and the entire onchain ecosystem.

and remember, actual protocol usage = fees = buybacks & burns = a constant flywheel if usage keeps growing.

i’m not saying we’re guaranteed to hit $150M but holy fuck the r/r here is insane imo.

stop getting emotional over every red candle. we’re talking about a project generating REAL fees, shipping constantly and trading at a fraction of its competitors’ valuations.

i’ve been holding for over a month and my conviction hasn’t changed one bit.

let them fucking cook.

$MASK
21 replies 16 reposts 98 likes 3.3K views View on X
heat Verified account @heat
just painting the fucking chart.

$100M waiting room. sooner than you think.

bottom is in imo. get your entry before this shit sends again.

higher.

solana:HuAXPyDWDaMYFKuwQHpqL1oPnj93zdzWmtvFGzCeCUa7
20 replies 8 reposts 87 likes 2.8K views View on X
heat Verified account @heat
it's not fucking over. you hear me? NOT FUCKING OVER.

we're coming back stronger than ever, and sooner than you think. mark my fucking words.

the job isn't finished. not even close.

WE'RE JUST GETTING STARTED.