Twitxy Saved

Farrukh

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@implausibleblog

Content Creator 🤓
Photo Video & Drone Pilot 🎥
Entrepreneur & Tech Geek 🤖
Food Judge 😋
And now news as frustrated 👀
AskUs@Implausibleblog.com
United Kingdom Joined October 2010
3.7K Following 128K Followers 292K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Farrukh Verified account @implausibleblog
Good morning, opening with the Eurofighter, Fursan Al Emarat and a Chinook at #FIA2026

We fly into the show with Blade, meet Joby's test pilot Buddy, chat to a Black Hawk pilot encouraging girls into STEM, and test Soundcore's ANC earbuds with the very loud air display ✈️🚁
6:06
8 replies 12 reposts 59 likes 194K views View on X
Farrukh Verified account @implausibleblog
Journalist, "Do you have a message for the victims?"

Russel Brand's Father, "Victims? What victims? What Russel?"

Journalist, "Not Russel, his victims"

RBF "The girls you mean, who chased him and harassed him?"

Journalist, "No his victims"

RBF, "I don't care. it's just history"

My view:

You can love your son and still show compassion for the women he hurt.

A few words acknowledging what it took for them to come forward would hardly have been a betrayal.

What exactly gives Russell Brand’s father the right to call it “just history”? He can walk away from that interview and get on with his day. He has no idea what any of those women still carry with them.

It’s the word “just” that’s so cruel. The women know how long ago it happened. They’re the ones who lived through it. His remark tells them that, in his view, enough time has passed for him to dismiss what his son did.

Nobody asked him to stop loving his son. He was asked if he had anything to say to the women his son hurt. He could have said he was sorry for what they’d been through. He chose to tell them he didn’t care.
0:13
Farrukh Verified account @implausibleblog
Twenty years ago, Dannii Minogue publicly called Russell Brand a “vile predator” who “wouldn’t take no for an answer”.

Today, Brand was sentenced to 10 years and 6 months in prison for raping one woman and sexually assaulting three others.

Many believe 10 years and 6 months is far too short.

Speaking before the announcement Prime Minister Andy Burnham explained that support "still isn't there for victims in the way that it should be"

Adding that he has taken the decision to ensure there are rape and serious sexual offence teams in every police force by the end of next year.

And he praised the women who came forward saying "their bravery will, I believe, change the system more broadly"

My view:

The four women at the centre of this case waited between 17 and 22 years to see Brand convicted. That puts the Prime Minister’s words about bravery into perspective.

Coming forward meant revisiting some of the most painful moments of their lives, with no guarantee that a jury would ever hear their accounts.

Burnham has set a deadline, and the public can hold him to it. But the real test will come when someone walks into a police station to report a rape.

Will they be able to speak to a specialist, know who to call about their case and get support throughout the investigation?

That is what this promise should mean in practice.
0:56
5 replies 13 reposts 45 likes 2.5K views View on X
Farrukh Verified account @implausibleblog
What she said 👇

And nothing says democracy more than Boris Johnson appointing the son of a former KGB agent into the House of Lords, despite the initial assessment that granting Lebedev a peerage posed a national security risk as reported in The Sunday Times.
Supertanskiii Verified account @supertanskiii 1d
“Russia is starting to attack Britain” what do you mean STARTING?

Brexit was Russia. The rise of Reform is Russia. Widespread far right bot activity is Russia. Male street violence is Russia. European election interference is Russia. Widespread division and chaos is Russia.
View quoted post on X
0 replies 15 reposts 46 likes 2.2K views View on X