Twitxy Saved

theQuestion

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@ivefewquestions

I be asking questions n shit, using my question powers #chiefskingdom
52 Following 99 Followers 2.6K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

theQuestion Verified account @ivefewquestions
Depending on how these next few weeks unfold, particularly with our dropback passing game, Andy Reid might genuinely be talking his way into another Philadelphia situation. We’re going on THREE years of questioning the effectiveness of this passing scheme, yet the solution is always finding receivers intelligent enough to understand it. At what point does the responsibility fall on the coach to simplify his offense, maximize his personnel, and actually produce results?

You have Patrick fucking Mahomes. Why does moving the football consistently have to look like solving a calculus equation?
KC Sports Network Verified account @KCSportsNetwork Oct 28
Andy Reid shares what he'd look for in a potential addition at WR:

“You'd hope they'd be familiar with the offense. If they're not, they gotta be smart and be able to pick it up quickly — I've had players that have done that and done it well, but I would tell you there better be some form of an aptitude there.”
View quoted post on X
38 replies 70 reposts 695 likes 34K views View on X
theQuestion Verified account @ivefewquestions
Because they don’t play the exact same role? Rice is a physical, YAC-oriented weapon who thrives on manufactured touches, screens and breaking tackles. Downs is a more traditional route-running technician who wins with separation, timing and reliable hands.

They complement each other. Having similar areas of operation doesn’t make their skill sets redundant. And claiming Downs is outright better than Rice is another conversation entirely. The goal is to build a complete receiving corps, not replace one weapon with another because you think every slot receiver does the same thing.
CJ @CJTheAnalyst 17h
@ivefewquestions Why would I pay rice when Downs fills the exact same role as him and is better than him and downs also needs to get paid as well?
View quoted post on X
theQuestion Verified account @ivefewquestions
LMFAOOO now we’re attributing the success of a QB sneak to extraordinary upper-body strength? What happened when Jalen Hurts was putting up historic rushing TD numbers behind Philadelphia’s offensive line? Was he suddenly the greatest rushing QB alive? Or does this logic only apply when it’s Josh Allen?
Mitchell Ernst @Mitche524 11h
People love to hate on the Tush Push (myself included) but everyone really downplays how insanely strong you have to be to withstand 8000 lbs of force on all sides. Literally being crushed by 4 Toyota corollas.
View quoted post on X
theQuestion Verified account @ivefewquestions
Are you genuinely implying Josh Allen adds more value as a rusher than Derrick Henry? LMAO. By what metric? Getting more goal-line opportunities doesn’t make you a superior rusher. You’re confusing touchdown allocation with individual rushing ability. That’s literally my entire point.
Hobbs @hobbs1307 12h
@ivefewquestions @BuffMafia But if Derek Henry scores 21 one-two yd tds.....he by definition is an elite player.....a football player is a football player.
View quoted post on X
theQuestion Verified account @ivefewquestions
I’m convinced y’all are deliberately missing the point. Nobody disputes Allen’s ability as a runner. It’s impressive. But what does a highlight of him hurdling defenders establish about his ability to read defenses, process coverages, anticipate throwing windows or deliver the football? We’re comparing quarterbacking ability, and every rebuttal somehow turns into a rushing highlight.
7️⃣1️⃣6️⃣ TJ Verified account @TJDMCR 15h
The run here vs the Chiefs is one of the best individual plays you will ever see a QB make. Put the first guy out of his shoes, hurdled the next guy, got 10 more yards and a huge first down.
View quoted post on X