Juris Protocol

This account is verified. Learn more

@JurisProtocol

Building the premier lending platform for $LUNC ecosystem, delivering decentralized money markets to enhance financial accessibility & utility with $JURIS 🤝

jurisprotocol.com Joined August 2024

198 Following 4.3K Followers 10K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Juris Protocol @JurisProtocol Oct 10

🟡 با $LUNA ضرر کردند، اما هنوز به چیزی که ما روی $LUNC می‌سازیم ایمان دارند! 💜

سال گذشته در رویداد TOKEN2049، بعضی‌ها می‌گفتند:

«با لونا کلی پول از دست دادم؛ دیگه هیچ‌وقت سمتش نمی‌رم!»

اما امسال، پیام متفاوتی شنیده شد:

«من یک میلیون دلار روی $LUNA ضرر کردم، اما عاشق چیزی هستم که شما روی $LUNC می‌سازید. چطور می‌تونم ازتون حمایت کنم؟» 🤝

💜 با وجود ضررهای گذشته، هنوز افرادی هستند که تلاش‌ها و تعهد جامعه Terra Classic را می‌بینند و به آینده اکوسیستم $LUNC اهمیت می‌دهند.

در JURIS، ما معتقدیم اعتماد با حرف ساخته نمی‌شود؛ بلکه با تلاش مستمر، تعهد و حمایت واقعی از جامعه شکل می‌گیرد. 🛠️

گذشته را نمی‌توان تغییر داد، اما آینده‌ای که با هم می‌سازیم، به خودمان بستگی دارد. 🤝

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

💬 سؤال از جامعه فارسی LUNC:

به نظر شما، چه چیزی می‌تواند اکوسیستم Terra Classic را در یک سال آینده قوی‌تر کند؟

۱️⃣ توسعه و پیشرفت واقعی ۲️⃣ اتحاد و حمایت بیشتر جامعه ۳️⃣ کاربردهای بیشتر برای LUNC ۴️⃣ شفافیت و استمرار در عملکرد پروژه‌ها

👇 نظرتان را در کامنت‌ها بنویسید!

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

🟣 از JURIS حمایت کنید!

اگر می‌خواهید بیشتر با پروژه JURIS آشنا شوید، بازار رسمی آن را در WEEX بررسی کنید.

🛒 خرید و معامله JURIS با USDT:

👉 weex.com/spot/JURIS-USDT

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

🇮🇷 جامعه فارسی LUNC، همراه ما باشید!

برای دنبال کردن اخبار و فعالیت‌های WEEX به زبان فارسی، حساب رسمی فارسی WEEX را دنبال کنید:

👉 @WEEX_Persian

این پست را با دوستان خود در جامعه LUNC به اشتراک بگذارید تا افراد بیشتری از فعالیت‌های اکوسیستم باخبر شوند. 💜

JURIS | همراه جامعه LUNC

#JURIS #LUNC #TerraClassic #WEEX #TOKEN2049

Juris Protocol @JurisProtocol 4d

We appreciate your concerns, @HappyCatKripto, and genuinely respect your role as a watchdog for the Terra Classic ecosystem. 🤝

Let us be absolutely clear: We do NOT want to centralize $LUNC or permanently restrict permissionless CosmWasm deployments. Quite the opposite.

The security vulnerability is real, and the temporary restrictions were introduced for a reason.

However, we understand the concerns about transparency, centralization, and the potential implications for independent developers.
Therefore, we'd like to offer you the following:

1️⃣ Private technical demonstration: We invite you to a private call where we can demonstrate the actual attack in a controlled sandbox environment, without putting mainnet or user funds at risk.

2️⃣ A transparent remediation roadmap: Following verification of the vulnerability, we will present a proposed remediation roadmap, compatible with Terra Classic's Pay-Per-Job (PPJ) framework, with the ultimate goal of safely restoring permissionless WASM uploads.

3️⃣ Independent scrutiny: We welcome your questions, criticism, and input on appropriate safeguards throughout this process.

We do not expect the community to simply take our word for it. Security claims deserve scrutiny, and temporary restrictions must not become permanent privileges.

Our goal is to eliminate the vulnerability, not to eliminate decentralization.
Thank you for keeping a watchful eye on Terra Classic. We need people who ask difficult questions.

Let's work toward a solution together. 🤝
$LUNC | $JURIS | $LUNCPUMP

Jake Collis Verified account @HappyCatKripto 4d

LUNC is Being Centralised Right Under Our Noses 👇🏻

View quoted post on X

Juris Protocol @JurisProtocol 4d

@_JCH01 You keep telling people that your questions are going unanswered. Why not ask them publicly?

@luna_lover69 has already made it clear that the private line of communication is closed for several reasons, including your indirect support for and legitimization of GP's smear campaigns targeting his business and our brand.

If you have reasonable, legitimate questions or concerns, feel free to tag us publicly on X. We are happy to address them transparently, where everyone can follow the discussion.

You are not being denied answers. You are simply not entitled to special treatment or private access to our time.

The same communication standards apply to everyone.

$LUNC $JURIS $LUNCPUMP

Juris Protocol Verified account @JurisProtocol 4d

Regarding Terra Classic Governance Proposal #12236

We are genuinely struggling to understand the reasoning behind the NO WITH VETO votes on our proposal.

Let's clarify a few things.

We are simply asking for permission to update our own smart contracts for Juris Protocol and LSF Exchange.

These updates are necessary to address security issues, maintain our infrastructure, and migrate our liquidation engine.

We are NOT requesting permission to execute arbitrary code on Terra Classic, nor are we asking for Community Pool funding or control over anyone else's contracts.

In principle, we strongly believe that Terra Classic should have permissionless smart contract deployments. We do not want a permanently permissioned environment in which developers need governance approval just to maintain their applications.

In fact, we supported the introduction of the current temporary restrictions ourselves.

We did so because of serious security concerns and specific circumstances that we unfortunately cannot disclose further details about at this time.

These restrictions were never intended to become permanent. They are a temporary, responsible precaution while the underlying security issues are being addressed.

We stand by that decision.

However, responsible security measures should not unnecessarily prevent legitimate builders from maintaining and securing their existing applications.

We are simply asking to continue developing and maintaining our own products within the security framework that we ourselves supported.

We fully respect the right of every validator to disagree with our proposal.

But we would genuinely appreciate understanding what specifically justifies a NO WITH VETO rather than a regular NO vote in this case.

We remain committed to building on Terra Classic, improving its DeFi infrastructure, and contributing to a safer, more sustainable ecosystem.

🤝 $JURIS | $LUNC
🔗 validator.info/terra-classic/…

#TerraClassic #LUNC #JurisProtocol #DeFi
View quoted post on X

Juris Protocol @JurisProtocol 4d

Regarding Terra Classic Governance Proposal #12236

We are genuinely struggling to understand the reasoning behind the NO WITH VETO votes on our proposal.

Let's clarify a few things.

We are simply asking for permission to update our own smart contracts for Juris Protocol and LSF Exchange.

These updates are necessary to address security issues, maintain our infrastructure, and migrate our liquidation engine.

We are NOT requesting permission to execute arbitrary code on Terra Classic, nor are we asking for Community Pool funding or control over anyone else's contracts.

In principle, we strongly believe that Terra Classic should have permissionless smart contract deployments. We do not want a permanently permissioned environment in which developers need governance approval just to maintain their applications.

In fact, we supported the introduction of the current temporary restrictions ourselves.

We did so because of serious security concerns and specific circumstances that we unfortunately cannot disclose further details about at this time.

These restrictions were never intended to become permanent. They are a temporary, responsible precaution while the underlying security issues are being addressed.

We stand by that decision.

However, responsible security measures should not unnecessarily prevent legitimate builders from maintaining and securing their existing applications.

We are simply asking to continue developing and maintaining our own products within the security framework that we ourselves supported.

We fully respect the right of every validator to disagree with our proposal.

But we would genuinely appreciate understanding what specifically justifies a NO WITH VETO rather than a regular NO vote in this case.

We remain committed to building on Terra Classic, improving its DeFi infrastructure, and contributing to a safer, more sustainable ecosystem.

🤝 $JURIS | $LUNC
🔗 validator.info/terra-classic/…

#TerraClassic #LUNC #JurisProtocol #DeFi

validator.info Terra Classic (LUNC) Governance — Validator Info Proposal #12236 - Allow Juris Protocol and LuncSwap.fun (LSF) to Upload CosmWasm Code

Juris Protocol @JurisProtocol 4d

🚨 BIG NEWS FOR $INJ and $LUNC! 🥷🔥

Nasdaq has approved the listing of Canary Capital's Staked Injective ETF ($INJC)! Institutional adoption meets DeFi! 🚀

Did you know $INJ is already trading against $USDC on LSF Exchange on #TerraClassic?

💧 Liquidity Providers: Earn 2/3 of pool trading fees by providing INJ + USDC liquidity!

⚡ Arbitrage Traders: Explore price differences between LSF and other $INJ markets, helping align prices and drive trading volume.

📈 More trading volume = more potential LP fee revenue for $JURIS stakers!

🔥 Don't just watch the $INJ ecosystem grow. Help build its liquidity!

👉 luncswap.fun/app/trade/lunc…

@injective @luncswapfun

#Injective #LSFExchange #LUNC #DeFi

luncswap.fun LSF Exchange | Terra Classic Markets and DeFi Explore Terra Classic markets and prepare wallet-signed on-chain transactions across supported exchanges and DeFi protocols. Crypto-assets involve substantial risk.

Injective 🥷 Verified account @injective 5d

BREAKING: The NASDAQ has officially approved the listing of the first-ever INJ Staked ETF.

The ETF will bring unprecedented exposure to $INJ and will target staking 90% of its institutional holdings in the U.S.

The ticker is INJC.

View quoted post on X