Twitxy Saved

yingzhen

@liyzhen2

teaching machines ๐Ÿค– to learn ๐Ÿ” and fantasize ๐Ÿช„
now ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง @ImperialCollege @ICComputing ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ @NTUsg @NTU_ccds
ex ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง @MSFTResearch @CambridgeMLG
yingzhenli.net Joined April 2012
164 Following 4.5K Followers 702 Posts

Latest posts 5

yingzhen @liyzhen2
hot take: future AI conf can try human reviews with sub-category scores; overall score is algorithmically aggregated + noise

The alg. is secret within PC, only reveals at decision stage

(coming from my design experience for AISTATS 2024 review form as PC
0 replies 0 reposts 10 likes 867 views View on X
yingzhen @liyzhen2
Congrats to Ed!

Been co-supervising a PhD student together, I can tell Ed is definitely world class researcher in robot learning, and heโ€™s very much down to the technical details

I always find his labโ€™s robot demos of โ€œinstantโ€ learning with very high data efficiency stunning
Edward Johns @ CoRL 2026 Verified account @Ed__Johns Oct 27
Today weโ€™re out of stealth, and weโ€™ve raised a $40m seed round co-led by @creandum and @usv, to bring Instant Robot Learning to life.

For the past few months, weโ€˜ve been busy building a new company.

Machenta.

This follows results from a new kind of robot foundation model weโ€™ve built, which Iโ€™m so excited to share with you today!

Usually, it takes hours/days of data collection and training to teach a robot.

Weโ€™ve built a model that learns tasks instantly: one demonstration, no further training.

A model trained entirely in simulation, without a single pixel of real-world data.

A model where teaching robots is so quick and easy, it feels like physical vibe coding.

A model for robots that learn like humans do, from someone like you.

Welcome to the era of Instant Robot Learning.

Thank you @Kathi_Wilhelm, @rebeccakaden, @hkanji, @jonno_evans and all of our angels for your support!

@Machenta_

Learn more: machenta.com/blog/instant-rโ€ฆ

See below for what you can do with Instant Robot Learning!
View quoted post on X
2 replies 2 reposts 15 likes 1.6K views View on X
yingzhen @liyzhen2
My quite-late reaction to Jev:
"typed" models do not eliminate the possibility of "hallucinating" a wrong answer in the probability simplex ๐Ÿ”บ
Show us the calibration error (marginal or conditional?) ๐Ÿง
(Maybe also tell if you'd like to try out second-order uncertainty ๐Ÿ˜‡