While South Africa celebrates billion-rand renewable energy investments, impoverished communities in Theunissen are fighting for something as basic as the right to be heard.
For months, communities surrounding the 100MW Sonvanger Solar Power Plant have demanded transparency, meaningful participation and a binding Community Development Agreement.
Instead, they have encountered corporate arrogance, dismissive responses and now explicit warnings of potential legal action and financial liability against community leaders.
On 9 November, Daily Maverick revealed serious governance turmoil at Pele Energy Group, including executive leadership changes, the resignation of its independent board chairperson and an independent corporate governance investigation.
Yet this is the same company whose project representatives have spent months dismissing the concerns of affected communities.
In a letter dated 5 November, Sonvanger, Pele and JUWI warned that MACUA/WAMUA and community leaders could face legal proceedings and claims for financial losses if tomorrow's gathering damages property, obstructs access or disrupts operations.
We recognise the obligation to gather peacefully and lawfully. But we also recognise the intimidating effect of powerful corporations invoking potential financial liability against community organisers.
As governments, corporations, financiers and well-funded NGOs gather at international climate conferences to speak about climate justice, communities in Theunissen remain excluded from meaningful decision-making.
Billions are mobilised for climate finance, consultations, conferences and technical assistance.
But how much of that money actually transfers power to the communities in whose name it is raised?
This is the ๐๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ โ where the suffering of marginalised communities generates funding, influence and institutional legitimacy without necessarily changing the structures that keep those communities marginalised.
๐ Sonvanger Solar Power Plant area, near Theunissen, Free State
๐ฅ More than 1,000 community members expected
We demand a binding Community Development Agreement, independent scrutiny of unresolved grievances, transparency from financiers and meaningful accountability from the developers.
๐ข We call on communities, activists, civil society organisations, journalists and all defenders of social and environmental justice to stand with the people of Theunissen.
โ๐ฟ FROM THE BALLOT BOX TO THE JUST TRANSITION: PARTICIPATION WITHOUT POWER IS NOT DEMOCRACY!
What do South Africa's declining electoral participation and the exclusion of mining-affected communities from the Just Energy Transition have in common?
Both expose a democracy increasingly organised around the appearance of participation rather than the actual redistribution of power.
Citizens are invited to vote, communities are invited to consultations, and stakeholders are invited to dialogues. Yet the fundamental decisions about land, energy, investment and development remain concentrated in the hands of political and economic elites.
As MACUA prepares to launch its forthcoming report examining the Sonvanger Solar Project, we are asking a fundamental question:
Can an energy transition truly be called JUST when the communities who live with its consequences have little meaningful power to determine its direction or share in its benefits?
The Sonvanger experience raises uncomfortable questions about whether South Africa's green energy transition is transforming the extractive economic model or simply reproducing its inequalities under the banner of sustainability.
Our forthcoming report will examine these contradictions and challenge the growing tendency to confuse consultation with consent, representation with accountability, and investment with development.
Democracy cannot end at the ballot box. And justice cannot begin and end with a consultation meeting.
Read the reflection, From Ballot Box to Just Transition: Participation Without Power, as we build towards the launch of our Sonvanger report.