Dr. Deepessh Divaakaran (Dr. DD)

This account is verified. Learn more

@md_deepesh

Career Scientist | Geopolitics, History & Power Shifts Decoded Into Career Strategy | Neuroscience + Psychology + Dermatoglyphics | Founder & CEO, CareerNest

India deepeshdivakaran.com Joined November 2009

464 Following 20K Followers 3.7K Posts

Latest posts 5

Dr. Deepessh Divaakaran (Dr. DD) @md_deepesh 3h

I don’t like to say, I told you so. But can’t help it - “I told you so.” 😬

Dr. Deepessh Divaakaran (Dr. DD) Verified account @md_deepesh Nov 4

AI isn't just technology.
It's the new language of power.
America builds the machines.
China wants the advantage.

No gun is needed.
Sometimes all it takes is a dinner invitation.

Meet Jensen Huang.
Nvidia's CEO since 1993.
33 years at the helm.

His chips power the AI race:
OpenAI.
Anthropic.
Meta.
Alphabet.
Oracle.

He sits near the engine room of America's AI ambitions.
And the next race of weapons.

Enter Alice Huang.
She is a Chinese national.
An unlikely résumé.

A reported TV journalist.
Then private banking.
Then executive director at Shanghai's Hexi fund.
It backed Chinese technology.

How come a Journalist becomes an Investment Banker?
Unless you are part of Chinese Intelligence.

2023.
She became managing director at Singapore's Megaspeed.
A company spun from 7Road, a Chinese technology business.

June 2024.
Taipei.
A gathering of AI executives.

Whiskey.
Cameras.
Conversation.

Alice and Jensen, together.
Together again in May 2025.

Then the money moved.

June 2024 till February 2026.
Megaspeed's Malaysian affiliate imported $4.8 BILLION in Nvidia-powered AI equipment.

America restricted advanced chips from reaching China.
Megaspeed bought overseas, then rented computing power to Chinese clients.
Alibaba was a key customer.

A legal cloud service?
Or a regulatory loophole?
Investigators raised questions.
A clear case of smuggling.

Then came another twist.

October 29, 2026.
The New York Times reported:
US intelligence assessed Alice as an asset reporting to Beijing.
Surveillance revealed her access to Nvidia's powerful CEO.

Now imagine the objective.
Not stealing a chip.
Stealing tomorrow's decisions of American AI Strategy.

Roadmaps.
GPU supply.
Washington's export strategy.

Negotiations with Trump.

Who gets computing power.
Who gets left behind.

One casual conversation could become a briefing memo.
A hint could shift strategy.

Nvidia denies sharing secrets.
China rejects the allegations.
Yet one question remains:

When AI becomes a national power, where does business end and espionage begin?
My answer is everywhere.

View quoted post on X

Dr. Deepessh Divaakaran (Dr. DD) @md_deepesh 5h

If you are in America, Europe, or any Western country.
This is for you.

There is a very good chance that we are about to witness events blamed on outside powers.

Especially Aliens or something related to the same.

But it will be actually orchestrated by your own governments or Globalists.

And the objective?
To introduce new and far worse systems.

This is called the Hegelian Dialectic.
Or simply, Problem. Reaction. Solution.

Let me explain.

Suppose I want to introduce a system.
But you won't agree to it.

So I create a crisis.
I create fear.
You panic.
You desperately demand a solution.

And I offer you exactly what I wanted to introduce in the first place.

Something you would never have accepted otherwise.

And you accept it willingly.

That is how fear becomes a tool of control.

If these events unfold and we surrender to fear, we may end up accepting systems far worse than what we have today.

Brace for Impact.

Dr. Deepessh Divaakaran (Dr. DD) @md_deepesh 17h

The movie Ramayana tells us more about Indian politics than the story of Lord Rama.
Trace the intellectual trail.

Who advised the film?
Meet Dr. Akhilesh Kumar Mishra.
PhD in Hindi literature.
Pen name: Bodhisattva.

A Buddhist Name.
In Buddhism, ‘Bodhisattva’ means one seeks awakening for others.

Interesting name.

His writings:

2007.
He accused Ayodhya's Ikshvakus of injustice to women.

2008.
A controversial article on Rama and Sita.
Questioning Rama.
Highlighting Sita's suffering.

He claimed Rama ate meat.
And drank alcohol.
He even claimed Rama offered alcohol to Pregnant Sita.

2024.
He Wrote “Ayodhya Mein Kaalpurush.”
He potrayed Epics through power, suffering and injustice.

2026.
Credited as research consultant on this ₹4,000 crore Ramayana.

Now let's trace the ideas.

Ancient Jain literature.
Paumacariya reimagines Ravana from a moral lens.
A mere whitewash of Ravana.

Ancient Buddhist literature.
Lankavatara Sutra depicts Ravana seeking Buddha's teachings.
Again whitewash Ravana.

1873.
Jyotirao Phule.
Aryan conquest.
Indigenous resistance.
Caste oppression.

1900s.
Babasaheb Ambedkar.
Questioned Rama through caste, gender and justice.

1956.
Periyar.
Ravana as Dravidian hero.
Rama as northern domination.

Modern Bahujan interpretations.
Some portray Ravana as indigenous.
Oppressed.
A symbol of resistance.

Now go back further.

Ancient Zoroastrianism.
Asuras are revered.
Devas are rejected.

Later, from the same source came Indo-European theories.
The Aryan invasion narrative.

Different traditions.
Different centuries.
Different politics.

One recurring theme.
Oppressor versus oppressed.

Return to the movie.

An oppressed Ravana.
Devas as oppressors.
A subdued Rama.

Not merely cinematic creativity.
An interpretation millions absorb.

In India, oppression narratives fuel identity politics.
Identity politics becomes vote-bank politics.

This framing recalls modern politics, not Valmiki's Ramayana.

Don't make this film children's primary source for Valmiki's Ramayana.

The danger isn't just on screen.
It's what millions may believe was written in the original.

Dr. Deepessh Divaakaran (Dr. DD) @md_deepesh 1d

There are only three real currencies in this world.

1. Gold.
2. Oil.
3. Drugs.

Everything else? Just paper and numbers.

The globalists don't talk about money the way you and I do.

They transact in these three.

Once you understand this, you begin to understand how the world really works.

Until then?

You're just another character living inside the Matrix.

And you don't even know it.

Dr. Deepessh Divaakaran (Dr. DD) @md_deepesh 2d

The movie Ramayana is more than meets the eye.
Ravana is portrayed as the oppressed.
Rama appears weak.
Sita fights in the forest.

And this is far from Valmiki’s Ramayana.

Why these creative choices?
Who really stands behind this ₹4,000 crore project?

Let's follow the money.

1997.
Namit Malhotra founded Prime Focus.
It grew into a global VFX empire.
Its international arm is DNEG.

2020.
A2R Holdings enters the picture.
A holding company controlled by Namit.
Today, it owns 53.04% of Prime Focus.

2024.
Now the money trail reaches Abu Dhabi.

United Al Saqer Group.
A UAE conglomerate.
Invest ~1,889 Crore into DNEG's Luxembourg entity.

2025.
A European Company named Novator Capital also became a major investor.
With a 14.29% stake in Prime Focus.

2026.
Union Bank of India enters.
A ₹200 crore corporate guarantee is approved for a production loan for Part One.

Now examine the commercial network.

Namit Malhotra.
Prime Focus Studios.

Yash.
Monster Mind Creations.

DNEG.
International VFX.

Sony Pictures.
Global distribution.

Dharma Productions.
North India distribution.

A ₹4,000 crore global enterprise.
Two films.
Multiple corporate layers.

Mumbai.
Luxembourg.
Abu Dhabi.
Europe.

Now comes the real question.
Who decides the narrative?

You must have got your answer.

Watch Ramayana as the cinema, if you want.
Not as a substitute for scripture.

Ranbir's Rama is a cinematic character, not Prabhu Shri Ram.
Sai Pallavi's Sita is an adaptation, not Maa Sita.
Yash's Ravana is a reinterpretation, not the monstrous Ravana.

Cinema is not scriptural authority.
And the filmmakers should not present their interpretation as Valmiki's Ramayana.

In my next post, I'll investigate something far more sinister.
The politics behind this Ramayana.

A version shaped to suit the politics of today's India.