Twitxy Saved

Millicent Li

@millicent_li

cs phd @ northeastern | interpretability, evaluation, and training dynamics | formerly: @uwcse + @uwnlp, @meta fair, and @MSFTResearch
Cambridge, MA millicentli.github.io Joined November 2021
134 Following 291 Followers 99 Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Millicent Li @millicent_li
NLAs look like they "work"---but compared to what? How can we know that they actually tell us anything about model internals?

In my new blogpost (and paper, to be presented at ICML!), we investigate whether activation verbalizers (like NLAs) produce faithful explanations.
Anthropic Verified account @AnthropicAI May 7
New Anthropic research: Natural Language Autoencoders.

Models like Claude talk in words but think in numbers. The numbers—called activations—encode Claude’s thoughts, but not in a language we can read.

Here, we train Claude to translate its activations into human-readable text.
View quoted post on X
4 replies 12 reposts 27 likes 2.4K views View on X
Millicent Li @millicent_li
highly recommend working with richard :) incredibly fun mentorship + I had a lot of fun as an undergrad at UW working on ideas that mattered to me! ASU is very lucky to have him
Richard Li @lichard49 Sep 8
I am excited to share that after 7 incredible years @uwcse , starting January 2027, I will join @ASU as an assistant professor and founding member of the School of Technology for Public Health with a joint appointment in @SCAI_ASU. 1/n
View quoted post on X
Millicent Li @millicent_li
How do we figure out whether a LM has learned the right skills, and in what order? We look at model internals :) Great work led by @_emliu!!
Emmy Liu @_emliu May 20
Copying → morphology/translation → basic arithmetic → complex reasoning & math. Across every model family we tested, LLMs acquire skills in roughly the same order during pretraining.

Can we use this to predict what a model will learn next, just from its internals? 🧵
View quoted post on X
Millicent Li @millicent_li
Wouldn’t it be great to have questions about LM internals answered in plain English? That’s the promise of verbalization interpretability. Unfortunately, our new paper shows that evaluating these methods is nuanced—and verbalizers might not tell us what we hope they do. 🧵👇1/9