Twitxy
Saved
@openmarkets's profile picture
View on X

Open Markets Institute

@openmarkets

We are a group of journalists & scholars in policy & economics working at the vanguard of antimonopoly to achieve victories that empower everyone.
Washington, DC openmarketsinstitute.org Joined September 2017
1.3K Following 12K Followers 11K Posts

Latest posts 5

Open Markets Institute @openmarkets
When the new Congress takes office in January, the question is: will this majority confront concentrated corporate power and technofascism – or simply oversee its continued expansion?

Democrats have a mandate for change, argues Dr. @CourtneyR 👇
techpolicy.press/voters-handed-…
www.techpolicy.press Voters Handed Congress a Mandate to Confront Corporate Power and Technofascism Courtney C. Radsch asks, will a Democratic majority in Congress confront concentrated corporate power, or simply oversee its continued expansion?
Open Markets Institute @openmarkets
The Democrats just won an election in which they told voters that powerful corporations & massive monopolies were the problem.

The only way to deliver on that promise is to do the work of dismantling that system. libertyandpower.substack.com/p/democrats-ju…
libertyandpower.substack.com Democrats Just Won a Mandate Far Bigger Than Many Realize From Big Tech billionaires to Wall Street landlords, Big Pharma lobbyists to Big Ag monopolists, Democrats told voters exactly who was making life harder. Now comes the hard part: taking them on.
Open Markets Institute @openmarkets
"CVS shouldn't get to decide what counts as an effective breakup. Policymakers need to ensure that it actually dismantles its power."

Important post from @stacyfmitchell @ilsr:
Stacy Mitchell Verified account @stacyfmitchell 4d
CVS says it's going to break itself up. After more than a decade of calls to separate its retail pharmacies from its PBM/insurance business, that's big news. But here's the thing: CVS's breakup has two major loopholes. Both are designed to preserve its power.

First, CVS Health would keep its specialty pharmacy business. These pharmacies dispense expensive, often complex medications. They account for 40+% of the pharmacy market by revenue. They're a major site of anticompetitive practices that squeeze independent pharmacies.

Second, CVS says the ties between the two new companies will be "preserved in commercial agreements." In other words, separate ownership, but keep the arrangements that create conflicts of interest and enable anticompetitive practices. A real (government-led) breakup would sever those ties.

CVS didn't arrive here all on its own. Tennessee and Arkansas passed laws forcing a breakup of vertically integrated pharmacy giants like CVS. CVS is fighting the laws in court. Senators Warren and Hawley have a federal bill. Antitrust scrutiny has grown, both at the state level and when @linamkhan ran the FTC.

Trying to sidestep these efforts is one motivation here.

But CVS also has business reasons to jettison its struggling retail stores. Amazon's growing pharmacy business is one. The perils of running an overbuilt retail chain when you haven't invested in workers is another. Anyone who's been inside a CVS lately knows these stores suck.

For more than a decade, I've been working with independent pharmacies and my colleagues here at @ilsr to expose the anticompetitive structures and practices that have driven so many local pharmacies out of business, and calling for a breakup of CVS.

But CVS shouldn't get to decide what counts as an effective breakup. Policymakers need to ensure that it actually dismantles its power.
View quoted post on X
0 replies 3 reposts 11 likes 516 views View on X