If you deploy an AI agent, you are accountable for that agent’s actions in just about every jurisdiction. For example…
“oops the agent did it, it was not me!”
was not a valid argument in Moffatt v Air Canada (2024 BCCRT 149).
California Civil Code § 1714.46 prevents defendants from asserting that “the AI autonomously caused the harm.”
UK Jurisdiction Taskforce and Singapore IMDA analysis both confirm AI lacks legal personality. Liability attaches through ordinary principles of contract and negligence.
No major jurisdiction has granted AI agents legal personality.
The dog may have eaten your homework, but regardless of how it transpired, you did not do your homework.
“oops the agent did it, it was not me!”
was not a valid argument in Moffatt v Air Canada (2024 BCCRT 149).
California Civil Code § 1714.46 prevents defendants from asserting that “the AI autonomously caused the harm.”
UK Jurisdiction Taskforce and Singapore IMDA analysis both confirm AI lacks legal personality. Liability attaches through ordinary principles of contract and negligence.
No major jurisdiction has granted AI agents legal personality.
The dog may have eaten your homework, but regardless of how it transpired, you did not do your homework.
@JustJake @joshmanders @Railway @ngeloxyz Ah yup. That was indeed me. No mallace intended. I've been running some agents to do signups + agentic testing on similar platforms. Just halted the harness I was designing around this as it was definitely going off the rails and reaching too farView quoted post on X