Pinned post
Ridark
Verified account This account is verified. Learn more@ridark_eth
Content Creator & Researcher | Ex Google
@CELE8EX · celebex.notpeople.ai/celebs/ridark-… | Dm open ✉️
@CELE8EX · celebex.notpeople.ai/celebs/ridark-… | Dm open ✉️
853 Following 16K Followers 11K Posts
Latest posts 5
A 22-year-old guy from Miami made $1,252 in a single day right when Fable 5.2 came out without writing one line of code
He opens Fable 5.2 the moment it drops, types a quick prompt for a retro arcade survival game
Fable 5.2 builds the full game in 5 minutes: smooth controls, pixel graphics, endless levels, custom sound effects
He exports the web-build, hosts it instantly on a gaming platform, and drops a monetization link
Then he posts a short video: "Fable 5.2 just released, I built this addictive arcade game in 5 minutes, play it now"
10 out of 10 stream it out of pure curiosity and start playing on their phones
He sets up a $2 instant level-unlock pack and cosmetic upgrades inside the game
In 24 hours, over 600 players unlocked premium features, stacking up to $1,252 profit
Just Fable 5.2 + a laptop + a phone
He opens Fable 5.2 the moment it drops, types a quick prompt for a retro arcade survival game
Fable 5.2 builds the full game in 5 minutes: smooth controls, pixel graphics, endless levels, custom sound effects
He exports the web-build, hosts it instantly on a gaming platform, and drops a monetization link
Then he posts a short video: "Fable 5.2 just released, I built this addictive arcade game in 5 minutes, play it now"
10 out of 10 stream it out of pure curiosity and start playing on their phones
He sets up a $2 instant level-unlock pack and cosmetic upgrades inside the game
In 24 hours, over 600 players unlocked premium features, stacking up to $1,252 profit
Just Fable 5.2 + a laptop + a phone
0:07
View quoted post on X
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6 Astra
The first 4-way model comparison result is here. And it's totally insane.
Same prompt: Dinosaur obstacle run.
Fable 5.2: 9.6/10 - 0h 45m 12s
Opus 5.5: 8.6/10 - 1h 12m 30s
Gemini 4 Carbon: 8.3/10 - 1h 20m 15s
GPT-6 Astra: 7.6/10 - 1h 35m 40s
I know I say it every time, but this is a huge leap. A huge jump.
Fable takes the crown with an incredible 9.6, finishing significantly faster and dominating the obstacle course like a pro!
The future looks bright and amazing.
What do you guys think?
The first 4-way model comparison result is here. And it's totally insane.
Same prompt: Dinosaur obstacle run.
Fable 5.2: 9.6/10 - 0h 45m 12s
Opus 5.5: 8.6/10 - 1h 12m 30s
Gemini 4 Carbon: 8.3/10 - 1h 20m 15s
GPT-6 Astra: 7.6/10 - 1h 35m 40s
I know I say it every time, but this is a huge leap. A huge jump.
Fable takes the crown with an incredible 9.6, finishing significantly faster and dominating the obstacle course like a pro!
The future looks bright and amazing.
What do you guys think?
0:27
View quoted post on X
One agent scoring its own find is a guaranteed yes.
Five that never see each other's work built this $100 desk.
I wired one prompt on Solana. Five agents, each doing one job. A coin moves left to right and any agent kills it.
1. Finder scans every new pair. Under $20k liquidity or past 6 hours: dead.
2. Auditor reads contract and holders. Top 10 above 35% or dev above 5%: dead.
3. Judge scores 0 to 100. Under 80: dead.
4. Stager sizes at 4% of the book. Sets the -25% stop before entry.
5. Closer sells half at double, quarter at triple, trails 30% under the high.
Seven rules sit above every score. 6 open positions, 3 entries an hour, -10% day kills the desk until midnight.
The Finder never knows what the Judge scored. The Auditor reads contracts, not scores. Something goes wrong and I get a name, not a story.
Rule 7 saved the desk. The creator pushed tokens toward the exchange and the Closer cleared at -6% in one block. The coin lost 91%.
Five that never see each other's work built this $100 desk.
I wired one prompt on Solana. Five agents, each doing one job. A coin moves left to right and any agent kills it.
1. Finder scans every new pair. Under $20k liquidity or past 6 hours: dead.
2. Auditor reads contract and holders. Top 10 above 35% or dev above 5%: dead.
3. Judge scores 0 to 100. Under 80: dead.
4. Stager sizes at 4% of the book. Sets the -25% stop before entry.
5. Closer sells half at double, quarter at triple, trails 30% under the high.
Seven rules sit above every score. 6 open positions, 3 entries an hour, -10% day kills the desk until midnight.
The Finder never knows what the Judge scored. The Auditor reads contracts, not scores. Something goes wrong and I get a name, not a story.
Rule 7 saved the desk. The creator pushed tokens toward the exchange and the Closer cleared at -6% in one block. The coin lost 91%.
0:24
View quoted post on X
HE PICKED UP A LEVITATING POOL OF WATER FROM A DIRT ROAD AND OFFERED IT TO A GOAT
900k views. 63k likes. 1250 comments. 12 seconds.
fisheye POV walking down a dusty dirt road, a floating disk of water suspended in the air. he reaches out, plunges his hand through the liquid surface, scoops up water, and holds it out. a curious goat walks right up, dips its head into the floating pool, and drinks
why it works:
→ the camera angle mimics a natural first-person walk: low, fisheye lens, shifting perspective, and a dusty boot stepping at the bottom of the frame
→ surreal physics made to look mundane. the way the water ripples, distorts the sun, and splashes feels completely tangible against the dry, barren landscape
→ flat midday lighting with no artificial fill. the harsh sun catching the edges of the floating water disc makes the impossible look like raw phone footage
→ the sequence unfolds naturally: discovering the anomaly, interacting with the liquid, and sharing the moment with the animal. the absurdity arrives effortlessly, never forced
→ one hand, one road, one surreal mechanic. almost nothing to keep consistent
→ picsart.go.link/31F4Z
the takeaway: realism comes from what you leave in. tactile physical interactions and natural camera imperfections do more than any high-end render setting
single-event surreal shots like this are what Seedance 2.5 does best, and you can run it inside
900k views. 63k likes. 1250 comments. 12 seconds.
fisheye POV walking down a dusty dirt road, a floating disk of water suspended in the air. he reaches out, plunges his hand through the liquid surface, scoops up water, and holds it out. a curious goat walks right up, dips its head into the floating pool, and drinks
why it works:
→ the camera angle mimics a natural first-person walk: low, fisheye lens, shifting perspective, and a dusty boot stepping at the bottom of the frame
→ surreal physics made to look mundane. the way the water ripples, distorts the sun, and splashes feels completely tangible against the dry, barren landscape
→ flat midday lighting with no artificial fill. the harsh sun catching the edges of the floating water disc makes the impossible look like raw phone footage
→ the sequence unfolds naturally: discovering the anomaly, interacting with the liquid, and sharing the moment with the animal. the absurdity arrives effortlessly, never forced
→ one hand, one road, one surreal mechanic. almost nothing to keep consistent
→ picsart.go.link/31F4Z
the takeaway: realism comes from what you leave in. tactile physical interactions and natural camera imperfections do more than any high-end render setting
single-event surreal shots like this are what Seedance 2.5 does best, and you can run it inside
0:12
i still don’t understand why more creators aren’t connecting Grok Bot to PicsartView quoted post on X
it could make you money & change how you work..
i wrote the full playbook: AI influencers, memes, videos, automation, and monetization - with prompts you can copy ↓ x.com/i/article/2119…