Twitxy Saved

Rosmine

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@rosmine

ex-Independent ML Researcher | Deft | LLMs for better writing
deftwriting.com Joined October 2023
659 Following 4.6K Followers 1.3K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Rosmine Verified account @rosmine
Announcing Deft, a new AI lab for better writing, cofounded with @jmrphy

See the picture for launch announcement the Deft model wrote for itself

Currently, 86% of user queries are fully human according to pangram.

This is still a small beta model and it might make mistakes. We are launching our public beta now to get more feedback before scaling up.

Tips for better performance:
- Add more details to your prompt. If you just provide a short sentence prompt, it will likely get detected as AI.
- Try changing the style in "advanced options"
- Deft currently works better for some use cases like Analysis/Essays, Creative writing, and Rewrites. It works less well for Marketing copy and news articles.

Our main goal is better writing, fooling AI detectors is just a side effect.

Link below
148 replies 92 reposts 1.5K likes 734K views View on X
Rosmine Verified account @rosmine
AI Slop is less about bad writing style, and more about "content slop" i.e. generic ideas that AI outputs

Deft can't help with lazy content. But if you have original content you need to write up well, Deft can help
Justin Murphy Verified account @jmrphy 1d
We’ve had a major breakthrough in our AI model for writing/editing.

We also learned a surprising lesson that is happy news for people worried about AI overtaking humans.

Deft is once again the only model that gets 100% human on Pangram (about 90% of the time)

(in case you missed it, my partner @rosmine invented a new training algorithm that writes creative prose uncorrelated with top LLMs aka slop and we’ve been refining it for several months)

What we realized is that the big LLMs do not just produce “style slop” but also information slop or what we call “content slop.” Everyone makes fun of the ’not X, but Y’ patterns but the LLMs actually overindex on certain substantive ideas too!

So if our users tried restyling text that contains AI-generated “content slop”, then our model could not rewrite it, retain coherence, and also get 100% human on Pangram. It would either retain coherence (and get flagged as AI by Pangram) or it would get 100% on Pangram but hallucinate and lose coherence.

The implication is actually really cool: Basically if you have no real, authentic, original ideas or concepts to feed it, then we can’t help you!

But so long as you have some original ideas or draft words to feed it, you should now get a well-written text that is 100% human on Pangram about 90% of the time.
View quoted post on X
3 replies 0 reposts 21 likes 928 views View on X
Rosmine Verified account @rosmine
I don't like these domain stealing pranks. They just seem confusing/mean-spirited personal attacks instead of clever marketing.

If I was Tibo I would give poteto.com as a present to @poteto Say "We asked Dot how to help poteto and it found this domain was available. So we got it as a present to prevent someone else from taking it. Dots prevent bad things from happening to you." (My dot has twice saved me from missing important emails, so this framing seems reasonable)
Tibo Verified account @thsottiaux Oct 28
poteto.com has landed
View quoted post on X
5 replies 0 reposts 57 likes 15K views View on X