Scott

This account is verified. Learn more

@scottstts

From the infinite potential of energy to the total actualization of entropy, intelligence charts a course for the pursuit of meaning, mission and love.

Dublin City, Ireland scottsun.io Joined September 2023

339 Following 5.6K Followers 14K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Scott @scottstts 3d

I added 3rd person view for my game Dyson City! Now you can switch between 1st and 3rd person view with `V`, `H` to turn on and off the helmet

character model created with @tripoai smart mesh, textured, rigged, and animated there. Opus 5.5 did the animation fitting, integration, AO & light baking, etc. Running in the magical @threejs r187

Live here: dyson.scottsun.io

1:19

Scott @scottstts 3h

Fable 5.2 one shot this, had it running in the back and forgot...

It's definitely more capable of working on things autonomously than opus 5.5. opus 5.5 can get to this no problem but will take much more nudges and iterations

1:16

Scott @scottstts 4h

I thought Anthropic was suspiciously generous with the resets, turns out they’re just fable usage resets, doesn’t actually reset weekly usage…

Scott @scottstts 4h

I don’t think I’ll use fable 5.2 for actually building stuff, it’s so slow and doubles the usage, better for planning and orchestration

Opus 5.5 is still the best option overall until opus 5.6

Scott @scottstts 4h

Sounds like a human problem, not AI problem

matharium Verified account @matharium 10h

Terence Tao says that the AI proof on the Navier–Stokes problem is correct, yet mathematicians learned almost nothing from it. The proof is 100 pages, AI-generated and full of issues in its text, but a formal certificate in the language Lean confirms it.

Navier–Stokes is a Millennium Prize problem that asks whether the equations for fluids like water can start smooth and then blow up, with velocity or pressure becoming infinite. Human mathematicians came very close, and OpenAI ran its biggest model, with millions of dollars of compute, to get there first.

A human proof normally comes with talks on what was tried, what worked and what it connects to, like picking fruit and planting the seeds. Tao calls this one strip mining: the fruit taken, the landscape left barren. One colleague, using lots of AI, could explain only half of it after days of work.

View quoted post on X