Twitxy Saved

Steven Sinofsky

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@stevesi

Subscribe …rdcoresoftware.learningbyshipping.com • seed investing • writing • ॐ •🙏• I use '—' and no AI to write • tweets saved 90 days • 📷
🌏 linkedin.com/in/sinofsky Joined February 2008
5.5K Following 214K Followers 3.1K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Steven Sinofsky Verified account @stevesi
As painful as the next months will be and as new as this deluge is to many, this is decidedly a healthy thing and good in the long run. There is light at the end of this. 🙏

Code lives much longer than anyone ever intended. Part of the reality is new tools for identifying risk become available and force revisiting that old code and making it better in the face of bad actors. The new tools are always a step function in discovery. As Stephen J Gould wrote, "change happens in long periods of stability (stasis) interrupted by short, rapid bursts of major transformation."

We are in the midst of such a major transformation.

This is not unlike other engineering where a significant (negative) event happens that forces a review of procedures and architectures that were thought to be reliable. The first time going through this is extraordinarily difficult. But in the end, "to engineer is human" as the wonderful Henry Petroski wrote in describing this cycle of learning from the discovery of failure.

The internet has been through these crises of architecture before. The volume seems to double each time and the amount of work rises at least as much. This is a direct result of the internet itself—connecting everyone and every device means everything that happens, good or not, happens at twice the scale and half the time as it did before.

🙏🙏🙏
Nick Dobos Verified account @NickADobos Oct 23
3% of “critical” software security bugs, in all of recorded history, have been found in the last month.

This is on pace to find another ~100,000 bugs this year alone, adding ~26% more vulnerabilities to the all time total

Do you realize how fucking insane that is?
View quoted post on X
6 replies 19 reposts 137 likes 14K views View on X
Steven Sinofsky Verified account @stevesi
Uh oh, @grok has already acquired second system syndrome.

I wonder if G's defense will be more novel than every prior defense of a rewrite/rearchitecture?

blampson once told me "hubris is greek for second system syndrome."
6 replies 2 reposts 16 likes 4.5K views View on X
Steven Sinofsky Verified account @stevesi
This kind of prediction is medically irresponsible.
Fireside Alpha Verified account @firesidealpha 2d
Dario Amodei says cancer, Alzheimer’s, heart disease, and mental illness will be relics of the past in less than a decade, and that "we can create an age of miracles"

“You know, if today we look at things like cancer, Alzheimer’s, heart disease, mental illness, these will be relics of the past in, I think, less than a decade."

"And I believe that the company which gets the risks right will also be the company that has the license to operate that society trusts and society believes can build the benefits in the right way."

"I think if we do this right, we can create an age of miracles where humanity is able to solve problems that have eluded us for millennia."

"We have to make sure that all the risks, all the ways that things can go wrong with this technology, we very carefully address those risks as we bring the benefits, and as we have a viable business at the same time.”
View quoted post on X
38 replies 10 reposts 129 likes 11K views View on X
Steven Sinofsky Verified account @stevesi
💪
Bill Gurley Verified account @bgurley 2d
This is another "must read" AI article in @nytimes. Jaron Lanier speaks with experience about Silicon Valley's ability to think fantastically about what their technology can do - to the point of radicalism.

He unpacks Anthropic's unusual & error-prone approach to safety, which is a direct result of their religious belief that AI models will one-day run the world and "manage the humans." It's this belief that causes them to approach safety through "alignment," vs control & constraint.

Regulators should understand that "building a technology that eventually controls us" is their ultimate goal or assumption. As such, this one company should be as far away from the regulation process as possible. (unfortunately they are actively in the mix).

The mid-terms were won on the message of being anti-big tech & anti-billionaire. This will be an interesting test. Anthropic has built the most-potent "billionaire machine" ever created. If they get to write the regulation, they will try to kill open-models, and create 10x more billionaires than they already have.

I will leave you with this from Jaron; "Someone’s metaphysical beliefs should be protected and are none of my business. It is also reasonable for nonbelievers to refuse the imposition of a religion from others."

nytimes.com/2026/11/09/opi…
View quoted post on X