People are overreacting to this. Wouldn’t surprise me if Kalshi does the same thing in two weeks.
Someone sees LeBron in an ad and a $25 signup promo, downloads the app, and wants to bet on football this Sunday. I doubt checking the taker fee coefficient is next on his list.
Once the intro discount ends, the lowest-volume tier pays about 63 cents more than Kalshi on 100 contracts at 50¢. Is he really withdrawing his money and signing up somewhere else over that?
If you’re trading all day, obviously that adds up. But the person putting $50 on a game is probably using whichever app already has his money in it.
I don’t like the increase either, but I think people here care about it a lot more than the customers paying it. If those customers keep betting, Kalshi is probably wondering how much more it could charge too.
Someone sees LeBron in an ad and a $25 signup promo, downloads the app, and wants to bet on football this Sunday. I doubt checking the taker fee coefficient is next on his list.
Once the intro discount ends, the lowest-volume tier pays about 63 cents more than Kalshi on 100 contracts at 50¢. Is he really withdrawing his money and signing up somewhere else over that?
If you’re trading all day, obviously that adds up. But the person putting $50 on a game is probably using whichever app already has his money in it.
I don’t like the increase either, but I think people here care about it a lot more than the customers paying it. If those customers keep betting, Kalshi is probably wondering how much more it could charge too.
Disappointing to see PolymarketUS taker fees increase to the point where Kalshi’s taker fee coefficient (0.07) is now lower for standard sports markets if you’re not in tier 4View quoted post on X