AESG author @MichaelRStrain recently published an op-ed in @FT arguing that the goals of increasing manufacturing employment and reducing the trade deficit are wrong-headed.
He cites his 2024 AESG paper, which points out that policies aimed at increasing manufacturing jobs and reducing the trade deficit have failed to raise employment and reduce the country’s reliance on China. More broadly, he suggests that seeking to boost manufacturing employment is a fundamentally misguided goal, since the decline in US manufacturing jobs is largely a result of productivity increases that have raised living standards for typical American households. Rather than attempting to turn back the clock, economic policy should be focused on connecting workers to the jobs of the future.
Read the op-ed here: ft.com/content/800da7…
He cites his 2024 AESG paper, which points out that policies aimed at increasing manufacturing jobs and reducing the trade deficit have failed to raise employment and reduce the country’s reliance on China. More broadly, he suggests that seeking to boost manufacturing employment is a fundamentally misguided goal, since the decline in US manufacturing jobs is largely a result of productivity increases that have raised living standards for typical American households. Rather than attempting to turn back the clock, economic policy should be focused on connecting workers to the jobs of the future.
Read the op-ed here: ft.com/content/800da7…
2/ The goals of the trade war were to boost manufacturing employment and to reduce the goods trade deficit. These are wrongheaded goals. economicstrategygroup.org/publication/st…View quoted post on X
@AspenEcon