Behind The Retraction

ScienceGuardians Verified account @SciGuardians · Sep 21, 2025

🚨 Update: Taylor & Francis Under Notice — Their Response & Our Reply

On 18 Sept 2025, Dr. Sabina Alam (Director of Publishing Ethics & Integrity) replied to our formal notice of 8 Sept (also addressed to Laura Wilson, Head of Research Integrity & Ethics).

📌 On 20 Sept 2025, ScienceGuardians™ replied, providing the following archived evidence:

• Public exposé & notice (full text): scienceguardians.substack.com/p/formal-notic…
• X thread: x.com/SciGuardians/s…
• Archive of PubPeer activity (Nick Wise): archive.is/amMQu
• Archives revealing use/exposure of fake aliases (examples): archive.is/aGAie & archive.is/P2MJq — revealing that Wise operates under fake aliases. One of these, “Simnia avena,” was exposed by Leonid Schneider, an aggressive online stalker and key PubPeer Network Mob member, who has been self-implicated under EU and German laws for multiple legal crimes and violations (see: x.com/SciGuardians/s…). We have also documented extensive collaboration between Nick Wise and Leonid Schneider, further underscoring the conflicts of interest and coordinated activities at play. This archive shows only the tip of the iceberg: articles authored by Wise for the highly derogatory blog operated by Schneider (archive.is/pFF10). It represents just a small fraction of the extensive evidence of collaboration between these two actors, which we have documented and thoroughly archived.
• Archive of alias “Simnia avena” activity: archive.is/mItH5
• Archive screenshots of post-appointment activity (examples): archive.is/7VcOy ; archive.is/eI55e ; archive.is/MA0fB ; archive.is/ZZl7T
• Archive of collusion with external actors: archive.is/dlWw5 — documenting Nick Wise’s collaboration with an established member of the PubPeer Network Mob, responsible for orchestrating defamation campaigns against senior academics, including Nobel Laureate and Stanford University Professor Thomas C. Südhof, while he simultaneously served as Research Integrity Manager at Taylor & Francis.
• Recent evidence of defamatory amplification and intimidation: x.com/SciGuardians/s… — documenting threats to retract papers, defamatory attacks, and the unprofessional, inflammatory amplification of these attacks by the institutional arm of the PubPeer Network Mob, Retraction Watch. 🚨⚠️ The suspicious move by Taylor & Francis to issue a warning that the paper is “under investigation” — rather than working in good faith with the authors — constitutes a clear act of intimidation and provocation. This development strengthens our concerns that the publisher’s integrity office has been infiltrated and compromised.

⚖️ Should third parties experience reputational, professional, or financial harm linked to conflicts of interest, collusion, or abuse of insider access by Mr. Wise, liability may extend to Taylor & Francis and to its leadership if this notice is ignored or dismissed without proper investigation.

🔱📢📑 Full exchange now public on @SciGuardians’ Substack account:
👉 scienceguardians.substack.com/p/taylor-and-f…

@SecKennedy @DrJBhattacharya @AaronSiriSG @RenzTom @laralogan @HHS_ORI @NIH @C0PE @UKRIO @ClarivateAG @timeshighered @ElsevierConnect @SpringerNature @WileyGlobal @PLOS @ScienceMagazine @TheLancet @Nature @USDAScience @FrontiersIn @TimKersjes @chrisgrafpub @EggletonKim @Maria_Kowalczuk @latwec @EllaFlemyng @Phil_Baty @lisalibrarian @cshperspectives @JAByrneSci @cpiller @DoctorZen @LizWhitlockMD @AJEisch @SimonGandevia @HollyElse @Einstein_Berlin @NerdyChristie @MiryamNaddaf @Kate_Travis @armarcus @ivanoransky @DeniseOrdway @hholdenthorp @MeaganPhelan @fenellasaunders @EnagoAcademy @peerrevcongress @WCRIFoundation

View quoted post on X

ScienceGuardians Verified account @SciGuardians · May 10, 2025

⚡️🚨 BREAKING: Prof. Ioannidis’s courageous stand reminds the world that he has not been alone.

⚠️ For years, the perpetrators of the PubPeer Network Mob—a tight-knit malicious group obsessed with controlling scientific narratives—has engaged in coordinated harassment, distortion, and extortion tactics against countless scientists.

🏛️ One of their most shameful targets? @NobelPrize Laureate Professor Thomas Südhof of @Stanford.

This is a world-renowned neuroscientist whose work revolutionized medicine—yet he has been relentlessly attacked, censored, and defamed by the very same network that pretends to champion “scientific integrity”.

As Prof. Südhof documents, these mobs exploit AI tools and social media echo chambers to fabricate accusations, manipulate perception, and pressure journals and institutions—all while profiting from their manufactured scandals.

🚨 This is not scientific integrity—it’s weaponized manipulation masquerading as oversight.

🧾 For those seeking deeper insight: Professor Thomas Südhof, on his official @Stanford website, has extensively documented the scale of harassment, extortion, and manipulation orchestrated by the PubPeer Network Mob. He exposes how its members—many riddled with serious conflicts of interest, including financial incentives—have systematically targeted scientists.

⚠️ Importantly, Prof. Südhof does not speak in generalities: he names specific perpetrators—including Perpetrators 1 and 5 in our investigation— and lays bare their tactics here 👉 med.stanford.edu/sudhoflab/inte…

This is a must-read for anyone serious about understanding the depth of corruption masquerading as “scientific integrity enforcement”.

🔱 With every exposure, their house of cards crumbles further. What we have revealed so far is only the tip of the iceberg—a glimpse into the deep corruption, deception, manipulation, and fraud perpetrated by the PubPeer Network Mob over the past decade. The era of harassment and coercive narrative control is approaching its end—and ScienceGuardians™ is here to help facilitate the academic community’s full liberation from these malign actors.

🏛️ To the world’s leading universities:

The integrity of science depends on your commitment to uphold truth, protect researchers from orchestrated harassment, and scrutinize who claims to “police” science. The PubPeer Network Mob’s pattern of manipulation and coercion is a wake-up call—institutions must stand firm against bad-faith actors undermining trust in research: @MIT @Harvard @Stanford @UCBerkeley @Penn @Caltech @Yale @Princeton @UChicago @JohnsHopkins @Columbia @UCLA @Cornell @UMich @NorthwesternU @DukeU @USC @UCSanDiego @UW @UTAustin @UWMadison @BrownUniversity @UNC @GeorgiaTech @UF @VanderbiltU @RiceUniversity @Dartmouth @UVA @UCSantaBarbara @EmoryUniversity @OhioState @UniofOxford @ImperialCollege @ETH_en @UCL @Cambridge_Uni @NUSingapore @PKU1898 @Tsinghua_Uni @NTUsg @UTokyo_News_en @UNAM_MX @ucatolica @UCT_news @UniMelb @Sydney_Uni

🔎 EVIDENCE revealed so far:

• 🗂️ Evidence 1: x.com/SciGuardians/s…
• 🗂️ Evidence 2: x.com/SciGuardians/s…
• 🗂️ Evidence 3: x.com/SciGuardians/s…
• 🔄 Update to Evidence 3: x.com/SciGuardians/s…

📢 We encourage all members of the academic community to review and share these findings widely. Together, we can restore true integrity to science.

#ScientificIntegrity #PubPeerNetworkMob #AcademicFreedom #Empowerment #ScienceGuardians🔱

View quoted post on X

ScienceGuardians Verified account @SciGuardians · May 7, 2025

🚨 UPDATE: The PubPeer Network Mob has desperately tried to portray Reese Richardson, a Postdoctoral Fellow at @AmaralLab @NorthwesternU, as a mere early career researcher, to divert attention while continuing to harass members of the academic community (📸 Image 1). Let’s be clear: there’s a stark distinction between accusation and self-confession. Richardson’s crimes are based on his own admissions and self-implications, in writing:

⚖️ He confessed to:

⚠️Cheating by exploiting Northwestern’s systems, violating the CFAA (18 U.S.C. § 1030).
⚠️ Providing resources and training for illegally obtaining .edu email addresses, enabling identity fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1028) and potential conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371).
⚠️ Creating fake papers and citation metrics, engaging in wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343).
⚠️ Manipulating academic platforms like @ResearchGate and Google Scholar, further violating wire fraud and CFAA.
⚠️ Using a fake identity to bypass verification processes, reinforcing identity and wire fraud charges.

⚖️ Legally, fraud is fraud—those committing fraud under the pretext of “exposing fraud” are equally culpable under federal law (e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 1343, § 1030).

🚨 Richardson is an established member of the PubPeer Network Mob (1,056 entries), tightly coordinating with them and attending their meetings worldwide (📸 Image 2, from Perpetrator 4’s derogatory blog). His prosecution is critical to extract information about the Mob’s malicious activities—harassing, extorting, and defaming the academic community.

🔗 His blog posts reveal a pattern of pretextual misconduct, justifying his crimes while showing no remorse, reinforcing the need for prosecution under federal law.

🚨⚠️ If unpunished, Richardson’s crimes could lead to chaos: imagine every Northwestern student exploiting the university’s email system to create false identities, gaming academic and financial platforms. Or U.S. students using his “resources and training” to manipulate global academia with fake .edu domains. @NorthwesternU’s Research Integrity Office must act to prevent this—failure to address such misconduct risks enabling systemic fraud, violating their legal and ethical duty to uphold integrity (42 CFR Part 93).

🚨 Severe disciplinary actions are critical to deter junior researchers from resorting to fraud for personal gain or fame, ensuring such crimes are never normalized.

🔱 We urge @NorthwesternU, @HHS_ORI, and @NDILnews to act swiftly.

🔎 Read and share the original exposé for detailed evidence of Richardson’s self-confessions and self-implications: x.com/SciGuardians/s…

#ResearchIntegrity #ExposeFraud #PubPeerMob

View quoted post on X