Pinned post
Here is my latest piece.
In George Orwell’s 1984, the "telescreen" was a tool of state-mandated terror. In 2026, it’s a consumer convenience we bought, installed, and powered ourselves.
Why it matters: Three high-profile events in early 2026 have shattered the illusion that home security and smart devices are passive. They are, in reality, sophisticated targeting systems.
1. The "Search Party" problem
During Super Bowl LX, Amazon’s Ring debuted "Search Party," an AI feature designed to find lost pets by scanning neighborhood-wide footage.
The catch: The feature was enabled by default, effectively turning private homes into a warrantless surveillance grid without explicit owner consent.
The law enforcement link: Ring’s previous integrations with companies like Flock Safety and Axon already allowed police to access footage for ICE and CBP operations.
The risk: "It starts with searching for a brown dog," says Matthew Guariglia of the EFF, "but means the tech is there for face recognition and searching for suspects".
2. The "Vacuum" vulnerability
A software engineer recently discovered a massive security flaw in DJI robot vacuums while trying to use a PlayStation controller to steer his own device.
The breach: He gained access to live feeds, microphones, and floor maps for 7,000 vacuums across 24 countries.
The geopolitical angle: DJI is already banned from U.S. government use. This incident highlights the risk of intimate data sitting on servers controlled by foreign adversaries.
3. Cameras as weapons of war
On February 28, 2026, a joint U.S.-Israeli strike against Iran proved that surveillance is the ultimate reconnaissance tool.
The hack: Mossad reportedly compromised Tehran’s traffic cameras years ago.
The hit: AI algorithms analyzed footage of Supreme Leader Khamenei’s guards—their routes, parking spots, and schedules—to pinpoint his location for the strike.
The lesson: The cameras Iran built to control its people became the instruments of its leader’s death.
By the numbers
The American public is reaching a breaking point, according to a March 2026 Rainey Center poll:
72% of voters are concerned that data from U.S. cameras is used by China to develop AI.
63% fear Chinese-made software in security cameras allows foreign access to footage.
68% support legislation banning the storage of personal data in Chinese data centers.
The bottom line
Congress is facing overwhelming public pressure to act. Proposed solutions include:
Banning Chinese-origin software in U.S. hardware.
Mandating warrants for law enforcement access to civilian footage.
Requiring "affirmative opt-in" for all AI-powered surveillance features.
Go deeper: Orwell’s protagonist, Winston Smith, lamented that "Big Brother is watching you." He never imagined we’d pay $299 for the privilege.
Read the my entire memo here. @SilverBulletLLC @SamThePol @SolomonYue @KerryMcQ4Oregon @GordonGChang @samosaur @ShawnRyan762 @joerogan @sarahadams
cdn.prod.website-files.com/663a60b91deeae…
In George Orwell’s 1984, the "telescreen" was a tool of state-mandated terror. In 2026, it’s a consumer convenience we bought, installed, and powered ourselves.
Why it matters: Three high-profile events in early 2026 have shattered the illusion that home security and smart devices are passive. They are, in reality, sophisticated targeting systems.
1. The "Search Party" problem
During Super Bowl LX, Amazon’s Ring debuted "Search Party," an AI feature designed to find lost pets by scanning neighborhood-wide footage.
The catch: The feature was enabled by default, effectively turning private homes into a warrantless surveillance grid without explicit owner consent.
The law enforcement link: Ring’s previous integrations with companies like Flock Safety and Axon already allowed police to access footage for ICE and CBP operations.
The risk: "It starts with searching for a brown dog," says Matthew Guariglia of the EFF, "but means the tech is there for face recognition and searching for suspects".
2. The "Vacuum" vulnerability
A software engineer recently discovered a massive security flaw in DJI robot vacuums while trying to use a PlayStation controller to steer his own device.
The breach: He gained access to live feeds, microphones, and floor maps for 7,000 vacuums across 24 countries.
The geopolitical angle: DJI is already banned from U.S. government use. This incident highlights the risk of intimate data sitting on servers controlled by foreign adversaries.
3. Cameras as weapons of war
On February 28, 2026, a joint U.S.-Israeli strike against Iran proved that surveillance is the ultimate reconnaissance tool.
The hack: Mossad reportedly compromised Tehran’s traffic cameras years ago.
The hit: AI algorithms analyzed footage of Supreme Leader Khamenei’s guards—their routes, parking spots, and schedules—to pinpoint his location for the strike.
The lesson: The cameras Iran built to control its people became the instruments of its leader’s death.
By the numbers
The American public is reaching a breaking point, according to a March 2026 Rainey Center poll:
72% of voters are concerned that data from U.S. cameras is used by China to develop AI.
63% fear Chinese-made software in security cameras allows foreign access to footage.
68% support legislation banning the storage of personal data in Chinese data centers.
The bottom line
Congress is facing overwhelming public pressure to act. Proposed solutions include:
Banning Chinese-origin software in U.S. hardware.
Mandating warrants for law enforcement access to civilian footage.
Requiring "affirmative opt-in" for all AI-powered surveillance features.
Go deeper: Orwell’s protagonist, Winston Smith, lamented that "Big Brother is watching you." He never imagined we’d pay $299 for the privilege.
Read the my entire memo here. @SilverBulletLLC @SamThePol @SolomonYue @KerryMcQ4Oregon @GordonGChang @samosaur @ShawnRyan762 @joerogan @sarahadams
cdn.prod.website-files.com/663a60b91deeae…
