@StiberAdam
www.lesswrong.com "Illegible problems" as the 2027 political boss fight — LessWrong To legislate something, it must be legible. … 
@GjMcGowan I interpreted this as "nobody at Anthropic thinks BCIs will make you on a par with/smarter than a superintelligent AI and that's the solution to AI x-risk" (like Elon's suggested), not "nobody at Anthropic would have any interest in a BCI as, like, a cool thing to have"View quoted post on X
Today, we released the National Policy for Nucleic Acid Synthesis Screening to protect American biotechnology innovation while reducing the risk of misuse.
This policy establishes a new, government-wide screening requirements for synthetic DNA and the equipment used to make it. It will ensure companies selling nucleic acid sequences and synthesis equipment know their customers and prevent the malicious use of these materials and tools.
This policy strengthens our Nation’s biosecurity posture by establishing rigorous U.S. government-wide procurement screening and physical security standards for synthetic biology. It replaces outdated “self-attestation” systems with robust, independent verification. It creates a dynamic, SI-powered screening layer that assesses the biological risk from nucleic acid sequences, allowing the U.S. to anticipate and prevent malicious use and help stop dangerous gain-of-function research.
@NIST will issue rigorous new screening standards and @HHSGov and @USDA will certify synthetic biology providers. Together, these measures will strengthen American biosecurity, safeguard responsible innovation, and establish a global standard for safe and transparent synthetic biology tools and research.View quoted post on X
