I would agree with this take IF the academic publishing market didn’t make BILLIONS off peer reviewers’ free labor. If it was all free and open access - then totally! Community service! But in 2025 Elsevier made $3.5 billion. Springer Nature made $2.5 billion…
Peer review is:View quoted post on X
1. Fun
2. A way to learn methods
3. A sneak peak at the future
4. A chance to shape the field
5. Community service
6. A way to become known for your expertise
My feed - for some reason - has endless complaints about peer review, requests for payment, etc