This is a great thread, so important. As someone who does lots of reviews for journals against the clock, I'm sure I'm missing things. If AI catches them I'm delighted. Will take a lot of anxiety out of reviewing and let me think about big stuff.
Lots of debate this week on whether journals should ban AI in peer review.View quoted post on X
We actually tested this in our new preprint, and the results were pretty clear to me.
For context, I've reviewed for most of the big journals and evaluated 1,000 human reviews as an editor. I love to read and evaluate science.
TLDR: From now on I won't do any peer review without AI. For clinical trials, I'd even call human-only review dangerous 🧵