Twitxy Saved

Slow Ventures

Verified account This account is verified. Learn more

@slow

Generalist early-stage investors backing bold ideas. PortCos: Solana, Airtable, Gusto, Creators and more since 2011.
@kevincolleran @lessin @wquist @yrechtman
SF, NYC, Boston slow.co Joined September 2010
89 Following 26K Followers 1.4K Posts

Latest posts 5

Pinned post

Slow Ventures Verified account @slow
America invented drones. Then China took 70% of the market while we debated permits.

The airspace below 500 feet is the most valuable undeveloped real estate in the country, and we're not even allowed to use it.

New deep dive from @angelesahr on why the low-altitude economy is a $1T+ infrastructure layer hiding in plain sight.

See reply for full deck.
22 replies 8 reposts 104 likes 47K views View on X
Slow Ventures Verified account @slow
We have been partners and supporters of @tjparker and @elliotcohen since their earliest days building Pillpack... and now a very small part of their newest venture with @ashwinkmurali. Big announcement today about @GeneralMedicine
TJ Parker⚡️ Verified account @tjparker Oct 6
General Medicine has raised a $120M Series B led by @a16z. We're using it to build the healthcare store.

The only way healthcare will work is to make the customer the most powerful participant in the system. And the only way to do that is to let them shop.

Here’s why healthcare needs a store, and what we had to build to make it possible:
View quoted post on X
19 replies 0 reposts 22 likes 1.6K views View on X
Slow Ventures Verified account @slow
The standalone assistants lose.

The durable bet is that cognitive labor goes to zero. When it does, the scarce things are context, trust, and the network between people. Own those and the model layer stops mattering.

@yrechtman
Harry Stebbings Verified account @HarryStebbings Sep 7
The hottest category in tech right now is AI assistants.

The question is; who is going to win?

Instinct raised at $2.5BN. Has Benchmark and Index behind them.

Grok Bot is ripping with Elon and has the distribution machine of X.

And then there is Town, one of the only ones that’s actually making real money from real businesses.

Don’t write Zuck off. This will be his next play and integrated into every WhatsApp user’s product.

I sat down with Town Founder, @jgreze to understand WTF is going on, who wins and who loses?

Condensed my notes below!

1. We Have Passed the Point Where Humans Look at Lines of Code

Software engineering has crossed a threshold where machines increasingly write and ship code into production under model-based guardrails. Outside critical security controls, humans will spend far less time reviewing raw code. The future belongs to systems that manage autonomous AI agents writing software, running tests, and validating their own work.

2. You Can Build at the Speed of Machines, but You Can Only Learn at the Speed of Humans

AI development tools allow competitors to clone features in weeks, erasing traditional software head starts. But deep user feedback cannot be automated. While machines accelerate execution, true competitive advantage comes from maximizing human learning cycles and understanding customers faster than anyone else.

3. Why None of the AI Assistants Have True Product-Market Fit Today

Despite immense market hype, no current AI assistant has achieved deep product-market fit with mainstream users. Most products still cater primarily to power users rather than everyday workers. Before worrying about moats, founders need to create frictionless experiences that resonate with the mass market.

4. Network Effects at the Agent Level Will Separate AI Winners

Sustainable moats in AI assistants will come from multi-user network effects at the agent level, not single-player productivity. When autonomous assistants collaborate across teams to resolve queries and execute work, switching becomes increasingly difficult. Multiplayer workflows create organizational lock-in that personal assistants cannot replicate.

5. How Much of the Workload Stays at the Frontier Versus Open Weight?

AI application margins depend heavily on how much work requires expensive frontier models versus cheaper open weights. Complex reasoning may still demand frontier intelligence, while routine tasks like scheduling and email tagging continue moving down the cost curve. Shifting 80% of workloads to open weights over time could create far more sustainable economics.

6. My R&D Is Just Spent Getting Product Parity With the Giants

Competing with giants like OpenAI requires massive investment simply to maintain feature parity. Startups cannot rely on unique distribution if their underlying harness falls behind on core capabilities. AI assistants must invest heavily to match the execution speed and product depth of frontier teams.

7. Why Instinct Is Not a Competitor to Town

Consumer assistants like Instinct focus on rapid acquisition through subsidized personal tools, while enterprise platforms build monetizable team workflows. Although their technical harnesses may overlap, their target ICPs and business models diverge sharply. Enterprise agents monetize by embedding collaboration directly into daily operations.

(links below)
View quoted post on X
22 replies 0 reposts 20 likes 2.4K views View on X
Slow Ventures Verified account @slow
We backed Ryan when he built Cadre. We're backing him again with @ellis_company, solving the reason institutional has always meant expensive.

Private credit became a multi-trillion dollar asset class in about a decade while the operating stack underneath it barely moved. That gap is the opportunity.

Ellis is an AI-native operating platform for private credit, with agents that absorb the operational work rather than asking teams to work differently to get value from software.

The lesson extends beyond private credit. Sectors that resist software usually do not have a product problem, they have an adoption problem.
Ryan Williams Verified account @RyanAWms Jul 30
At @Cadre, I saw the gap firsthand. Large “institutional” firms built their own systems. But everyone else had to deliver with fewer resources, spreadsheets and manual work.

forbes.com/sites/jeffkauf…

“Institutional” should describe a standard, not a budget.

That conviction became @ellis_company

@JeffKauflin, @Forbes Ryan Williams’ Next Act After Cadre: A Fintech Fix For Private Credit’s Data Mess
View quoted post on X
6 replies 3 reposts 24 likes 5.4K views View on X
Slow Ventures Verified account @slow
AI isn't just changing how engineers build. It's changing who gets to build at all.

We ran the first Creator AI Bootcamp in San Francisco earlier this year. Creators from all over flew in and walked away with custom agents, content workflows, and automations they were using the next day.

We're running it back in NYC, two days starting September 9 alongside our Creator Fund team including @lessin @mmlightcap @Jack_Raines and more.

See reply to learn more.