Twitxy Saved

Will Connell

@wilstc

predicting phenotypes 🖥🧬🔮
wconnell.github.io/about Joined March 2016
1K Following 713 Followers 327 Posts

Latest posts 5

Will Connell @wilstc
If the goal is to simulate a cell’s gene regulatory logic I think a strong test is predicting held out time pts on a dataset of densely time-sampled targeted perts

Or a dataset of dense dose-sampled perts

We’re desperately missing measured changes over close cont intervals
Surag Nair @suragnair Oct 5
Good time to ponder what we might actually need to get closer to useful “virtual cells” eventually. Laundry list:

Measurements:
- non-destructive sampling of the same cell at <30 min intervals, high-quality measurements
- protein measurements, localization, TF-DNA binding 1/
View quoted post on X
Will Connell @wilstc
My scoped takeaway is that LLMs can do similarity search "by eye," matching patterns in a way that's independent of statistical methods.

IMO this is more interesting. And this idea generalizes, we formalized it as LLM Kernel: openreview.net/forum?id=Rq5wD…
Anthropic Verified account @AnthropicAI Sep 23
Claude has discovered a previously unknown enzyme system hidden in the DNA of bacteriophages. Beside the enzyme’s gene sits a long array of repeating DNA—a structure that looks somewhat similar to CRISPR.

We don’t yet understand what this system does, but only a handful of known systems share its features, and all of them are able to cut, copy, and paste DNA. Historically, the discovery of such programmable systems has helped revolutionize medicine. CRISPR, for instance, is now the foundation of genetic medicines. But it will take much more work to learn what this system does, and whether it can be put to similar use.

Read more: anthropic.com/news/claude-di…
View quoted post on X
Will Connell @wilstc
Imagine culling the tree of knowledge to reproducible conclusions.

IMO one of the first steps to accelerating science‼️

Eliminate entire hypothesis nodes that have misallocated scientific search for decades due to foundations of fraud, weak evidence, poor interpretation.
Sam Rodriques Verified account @SGRodriques Aug 26
BixBench3 is out! Our latest eval for biology capabilities in language models. Essentially requires agents to reproduce all work needed to write a paper from raw data. OpenAI is in the lead with 5.6-Sol at 48%, Anthropic is in 4th with Opus 4.8, after Kimi and GLM. Opus 5 has weird instruction following problems that severely degrade its performance. I’m sure Fable is great but can't be evalled on this. Read more below.

Also lest we miss the forest for the trees, we’re in a position now where the models can essentially reproduce entire papers ~50% of the time. Crazy time to be alive.
View quoted post on X